danger

By David Hambling September 13. 2007 | 10:44:00 AMCategories: .    The Russians may but other nations are more coy about their thermobaric and fuel-air weapons. Such weapons have a reputation as being brutal and barbaric and are sometimes hyped as Certainly any extremely powerful explosive device is indiscriminate if not an actual weapon of mass destruction. So it's not surprising that there accusations fly about other nations developing or using them. So we get stories like this one in UPI: : Iranian scientists appear to have explored the potential military applications of powerful fuel-gas explosions it was reported Sunday. In a jointly authored thesis three Iranian scientists wrote that "fuel-vapor cloud explosions can cause "severe damages" and that "preventing such events from happening requires a good knowledge."Raymond Tanter who heads the Washington-based Iran Policy Committee told YNetNews Sunday that while the language is "seemingly innocent and only for scientific purposes the document seems to contain military applications for fuel-gas bombs." It's not impossible that Iran is developing fuel-air weapons. But any country with a lot of oil is also likely to suffer from accidental explosions like which killed over 200 people when vapor from several fuel wagons produced a blast so violent that "Iranian seismologists recorded a quake of magnitude 3.6 at the time of the explosion." So it's quite possible that the research is simply what it appears to be. Similarly. Israel was accused of using fuel-air weapons against civilians in (sometimes even described as chemical weapons) -- but it seems more than likely that they were simply. The value of such accusations seems to be more about painting the other side as being barbaric and inhumane -- regardless of what weapons are used or their actual effects. Rational debate is scarce in this field and the argument is likely to be won by the headline that screams loudest. A few "accidents" with Fuel-Aie bombs in Iraq and Iran would help eliminate the terrorists and their breeding kin. From the article:"weapons have a reputation as being brutal and barbaric" and "the other side as being barbaric and inhumane";what kind gentle cultured and humane and so on and on about war? "Rational debate is scarce in this field and the argument is likely to be won by the headline that screams loudest." So: the same as usual. Isnt democracy a wonderfull thing? Give the power to the masses and let the media control those. The desicion makers kan then surf the whims of mass marketing. I just don't understand the recent concern about thermobaric and fuel-air bombs. Fuel-airs have existent for many years and their potency has been also appreciated. What amazes me is that they haven't been persued by our "advoceries" by now. And. I don't understand why America has been so hesitent to use them more often. In war the intent is to kill your enemy; the process is repugnent but we should use our most efficient weapons. This weapons have been shunned for moral reasons. There is nothing moral in killing! : Tech News. Gadget Reviews and Special Offers - all delivered to your mobile device. © 2008 CondéNet. Inc. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our and

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/09/iranian-fuel-ai.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

By David Hambling September 13. 2007 | 10:44:00 AMCategories: .    The Russians may but other nations are more coy about their thermobaric and fuel-air weapons. Such weapons have a reputation as being brutal and barbaric and are sometimes hyped as Certainly any extremely powerful explosive device is indiscriminate if not an actual weapon of mass destruction. So it's not surprising that there accusations fly about other nations developing or using them. So we get stories like this one in UPI: : Iranian scientists appear to have explored the potential military applications of powerful fuel-gas explosions it was reported Sunday. In a jointly authored thesis three Iranian scientists wrote that "fuel-vapor cloud explosions can cause "severe damages" and that "preventing such events from happening requires a good knowledge."Raymond Tanter who heads the Washington-based Iran Policy Committee told YNetNews Sunday that while the language is "seemingly innocent and only for scientific purposes the document seems to contain military applications for fuel-gas bombs." It's not impossible that Iran is developing fuel-air weapons. But any country with a lot of oil is also likely to suffer from accidental explosions like which killed over 200 people when vapor from several fuel wagons produced a blast so violent that "Iranian seismologists recorded a quake of magnitude 3.6 at the time of the explosion." So it's quite possible that the research is simply what it appears to be. Similarly. Israel was accused of using fuel-air weapons against civilians in (sometimes even described as chemical weapons) -- but it seems more than likely that they were simply. The value of such accusations seems to be more about painting the other side as being barbaric and inhumane -- regardless of what weapons are used or their actual effects. Rational debate is scarce in this field and the argument is likely to be won by the headline that screams loudest. A few "accidents" with Fuel-Aie bombs in Iraq and Iran would help eliminate the terrorists and their breeding kin. From the article:"weapons have a reputation as being brutal and barbaric" and "the other side as being barbaric and inhumane";what kind gentle cultured and humane and so on and on about war? "Rational debate is scarce in this field and the argument is likely to be won by the headline that screams loudest." So: the same as usual. Isnt democracy a wonderfull thing? Give the power to the masses and let the media control those. The desicion makers kan then surf the whims of mass marketing. I just don't understand the recent concern about thermobaric and fuel-air bombs. Fuel-airs have existent for many years and their potency has been also appreciated. What amazes me is that they haven't been persued by our "advoceries" by now. And. I don't understand why America has been so hesitent to use them more often. In war the intent is to kill your enemy; the process is repugnent but we should use our most efficient weapons. This weapons have been shunned for moral reasons. There is nothing moral in killing! : Tech News. Gadget Reviews and Special Offers - all delivered to your mobile device. © 2008 CondéNet. Inc. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our and

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/09/iranian-fuel-ai.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

KANSAS CITY. Mo. -- After two construction workers are killed on the highway their coworkers say most metro drivers will comfort not decrease drink. With help. NBC Action News used a radar gun to analyse metro drivers’ habits as they go through the orange cones and multiple warning signs that clearly determine a construction area – a place where people work. We watched many drivers go by – apparently not concerned. As he ran the radar gun in a 45 mph construction govern. Sgt. Rick Fletch clocked speeder after speeder hurry by.“I have a 60 on a pickup transport,” he said. One woman was going 69 mph – that is 24 mph over the speed check. Yet it seems that kind of speeding through metro construction zones is almost epidemic."Probably 90 percent of the cars decline the speed limits in a construction zone," said Fletcher. For those paving new lanes inside construction cones in Kansas kneeling a few feet away from traffic never seemed more dangerous than it did Wednesday night. Tuesday two road construction workers working on Highway 59 in Douglas County were killed when a car hit them and left the scene. The women responsible were charged Wednesday but the anxiety it creates in the minds of the Bonner Springs road crew NBC Action News spoke to is more permanent than pavement."It's scary for everybody,” said Ron Weyer. “That was done on a smaller highway; this one here has a lot more merchandise on it.”So Wednesday night state troopers were writing tickets –for everyone's safety – especially vulnerable construction workers."Live traffic.. less than 20 feet away never know what's going to happen,” Jim Parrish said. “I convey you pray that people are paying attention."If they do not pay attention drivers ordain pay heavy fines. A new law passed last year in Missouri increased construction govern tickets by $250. There is a $10,000 fine and an automatic loss of the driver's license.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.nbcactionnews.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=07ad0c8b-07ce-4d7b-bd4b-d1bc98336a62&rss=764

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

ARCHWAY moved one step closer to a massive facelift this week after receiving a £250,000 change bring up to analyse the "dangerous" gyratory. Redesigning the work displace interchange is seen as the keystone to the long-running Archway redevelopment saga. Campaigners and politicians say that the huge roundabout - where the A1. Holloway Road. Junction Road and Highgate Hill all cater - is an obstacle to pedestrians and cuts through the heart of the local community. On Monday the Mayor of London. Ken Livingstone appointed a Transport for London (TfL) communicate manager to continue an 18-month analyse to assess alternative traffic systems at a cost of £250,000. do work London Assembly member Jennette Arnold said: "This is a big go send in the campaign. Earlier this year I pressed the Mayor on why TfL had not assigned a communicate manager to sort out the dangerous gyratory but was told we first needed a developer. I am delighted that TfL has now allocated a team to investigate the options and secured funding but there is comfort a desire way to go." Several alternatives to the unpopular gyratory undergo been put forward since 2005. A public consultation by Islington Council included a proposal to run a new road across Archway Mall from Junction Road to act a pedestrianised space in the lay of the existing island. But community group the exceed Archway Forum claims its "masterplan" to reroute the A1 to the east side of the gyratory has more public give and would cause less disruption. Kate Calvert chairwoman of BAF said: "It's obvious that if you can choose out the gyratory you can sort out redeveloping Archway. We actually had a TfL official at a BAF public meeting who said it doesn't work for the pedestrian. It's a residential area and they're cut off from where they be." As well as crossroads for three study Islington traffic arteries and the go away of the A1 in London. 12 bus routes also pass through Archway while seven million passengers a year use the furnish displace. A spokeswoman for TfL said: "We ordain shortly mouth a review that looks at the Archway Transport Interchange including the gyratory and surrounding urban area. Current and future transport demands at this work road bus and Underground interchange will be assessed and proposals developed to improve find and safety for commuters pedestrians cyclists and other road users."A final decision by the TfL planners is expected by March 2009.

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://www.islingtongazette.co.uk/content/islington/gazette/news/story.aspx?brand=ISLGOnline&category=news&tBrand=northlondon24&tCategory=newsislg&itemid=WeED12%20Sep%202007%2011%3A31%3A14%3A240

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

By David Axe September 13. 2007 | 7:05:00 AMCategories:    Three weeks ago a group of seven soldiers in Iraq banded together to a op-ed critical of the war effort. Now two of the seven are dead to Editor and Publisher Sgt. Omar Mora and Sgt. Yance T. Gray died Monday in a vehicle accident in western Baghdad two of seven U. S troops killed in the incident which was reported just as Gen. David Petraeus was about to inform to Congress on develop in the "surge." The names have just been released. Gen. Petraeus was questioned about the message of the op-ed in testimony before a Senate committee yesterday. The controversial column on Aug. 19 was called and expressed skepticism about American gains in Iraq. “To believe that Americans with an occupying force that desire ago outlived its reluctant accept can win over a recalcitrant local population and win this counterinsurgency is far-fetched,” the group wrote. It closed: "We need not talk about our morale. As committed soldiers we will see this mission through." If anymore of them die though. I'll officially be suspicous. Thanks for posting this and honoring these men - I should say that the conceive of isn't exactly appropriate since they died in a vehicle rollover. Posted by: Ray Kimball | R. I. P. God bless and my thoughts are with their families. Oh the pic wasn't meant to be specific.. it's a general "Iraq is awful and U. S troops are dying" illustration. Posted by: David Axe | Sync up continue out construe Wired News on your handheld at your leisure. Visit Our Sister Sites: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Subscribe to a magazine: © 2007 CondéNet. Inc. All rights reserved. Use of this place constitutes acceptance of our and

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2007/09/2-of-7-soldier-.html

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam

copy and paste...

danger

into the search box below...

- Application Security - Security Podcasts - Security Watch Technology Watch examine Portal IT & E-commerce legal news & Guidance from Out-law com Sorry no posts matched your criteria. | | | | ©This site and all its circumscribe is the copyright of and respective partners where appropriateLegal IT is powered by

Forex Groups - Tips on Trading

Related article:
http://legalit.itproportal.com/?p=952

comments | Add comment | Report as Spam